Aspect Productions

Aspect productions provide a means for writing attribute definitions for a production outside of the definition of that production. Their form is similar to abstract and concrete productions in which the abstract or concrete modifier is replaced by the aspect modifier; that form is aspect production <name> <prod-sig> { <prod-body> } The name in the aspect production specification must match the name of a concrete or abstract production that is imported or defined in the same module as the aspect production. We refer to this concrete or abstract production declaration and definition as the original production in the discussion below. The production signature in the aspect must specify the same production type as the original production. However, the names of left and right hand side elements may differ from those in the original production.

Aspect productions can refer to attribute values defined in the original production or in other aspects on that production. The only restriction, naturally, is that the visibility of these other attributes follows the regular scoping rules of Silver and thus one may need to import the appropriate grammar module to access an attribute defined in the original production or in another aspect.

Local attributes defined in an aspect are only visible in that aspect and, thus, aspects cannot see local attributes defined in the original production or in other aspects of the production.

The semantics of an aspect are as if the declarations and definitions in the aspect were included in the original production (modulo any renaming that occurred in the aspect and renaming needed to avoid name clashes from any aspect-introduced local attributes). However, since Silver supports separate compilation of grammar modules we do not weave all the aspects together at compile-time. Type checking and code generation for grammar modules, and any aspect productions they include, are done independently with only a bit of overhead at run-time to accommodate this.

Example: In the tutorial grammar dc a collection of aspect productions are given in the file These aspects provide definitions for new attributes (also declared in the same file) that compute a better version of the pretty print attribute pp defined in that does not include the sometime unnecessary parenthesis that are used in pp.

An aspect for the abstract production add is shown below: ``` aspect production add sum::Expr ::= l::Expr r::Expr { sum.bpp = if wrapInParens ( sum.enclosingOpPrecedence, 1, sum.leftOrRight, “left” ) then “(“ ++ l.bpp ++ “ + “ ++ r.bpp ++ “)” else l.bpp ++ “ + “ ++ r.bpp ;

l.enclosingOpPrecedence = 1 ; r.enclosingOpPrecedence = 1 ; l.leftOrRight = “left” ; r.leftOrRight = “right” ; } ``` > Other than the use of “aspect” instead of “abstract” this production looks like any other production definition. It defines a synthesized attribute (bpp) and two inherited attributes (enclosingOpPrecedence and leftOrRight). Since the constructs declared in are visible in this file, this aspect could use the value of the pp attribute defined on in the original add production in the file, though it makes little sense to do so in this example.

Although this aspect uses the same names for the left and right hand side elements (sum, l, and r) as used in the original production we could have changed, for example, sum to s throughout and it would have the same effect.